<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Filters and False Positives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cfea.org/2007/02/22/spam-filters-and-false-positives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cfea.org/2007/02/22/spam-filters-and-false-positives/</link>
	<description>College Fraternity Editors Association</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Pearce &#124; relatively irrelevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can DNSBLs Keep Spammers At Bay?</title>
		<link>http://cfea.org/2007/02/22/spam-filters-and-false-positives/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Pearce &#124; relatively irrelevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can DNSBLs Keep Spammers At Bay?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfea.org/2007/02/22/spam-filters-and-false-positives/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>[...] our members and our staff about why they might get blocked has led to this posting earlier this week, along with taking the time to respond to each user&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our members and our staff about why they might get blocked has led to this posting earlier this week, along with taking the time to respond to each user&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.775 seconds -->
